STATEMENT OF FACTS

  • JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names
    being fictious and unknown persons), and
    ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictitious and unknown entities),
  • Defendants. _________________________________________/
    • The Plaintiff, WE THE PEOPLE serves their suit against the Defendants, and allege within this website as follows:
    • Introductions are hereby incorporated in Series 1-8 in video format and in the Blog evidencing the suspension of the Constitution for the United States.
    • Background are hereby incorporated in the whistleblower testimony evidenced a separate implied Constitution in the FORM "OF" re-consistituted zero sum depreciation write offs via federalization tax evasion schemes implemented through certain members of Congress and the currently led Democratic party.
    • In RE: TRADEMARK UNIFORM MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM (TUMERS)
    • STATEMENT OF FACTS, UNDER COLOR OF LAW, UNDER COLOR OF OFFICE
    • Established pattern on every MERS in UNIFORM DEED OF TRUST across the Nation
    • 1. On ————instrument number ————was recorded in —— in the STATE of _____ .
    • The INSTRUMENT recorded is labeled as DEED OF TRUST
    • The instrument recorded references the Grantor/Borrower as (ALL CAP NAME)
    • The INSTRUMENT recorded was upon FORM ——-
    • The INSTRUMENT recorded notates it was a Fannie Freddie UNIFORM INSTRUMENT
    • The INSTRUMENT identifies the “Lender” as ———-
    • The INSTRUMENT identifies ”MERS”  as the Mortgage Electronic Registration System.
    • The INSTRUMENT states that MERS is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument
    • “Beneficiary” means a person to whom a donative transfer of property is made or that person's successor in interest, and: (a) As it relates to the intestate estate of a decedent, means an heir.
    • The Security Instrument was not disclosed upon the DEED OF TRUST as the SECURITY AGREEMENT dated as of June 30, 1998 between MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, al Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”) and  NATIONSBANK, N.A., a national banking association (the “Bank”)
    • The SECURITY AGREEMENT references obligations of the Borrower contained in the Credit Agreement and other Loan Documents to which it is a party.
    • “Banks” can only lend credit to other “Banks” or other “commercial entities".   Quotations emphasis added.
    • According to UCC General Definitions 1-201 (27) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity.
    • The rules of Grammar are specific when capitalizing the first letter of a word within a quotation.   English capitalization rules apply to Names of other Proper Nouns.
    • A proper noun is the name of a particular person, place, organization, or thing. Proper nouns begin with a capital letter.
    • The SECURITY AGREEMENT was recorded as 100804608 dated 08-27-1998 FORM PTO-1618A stamped by JWATKINS into the U.S. Patent & TMOfc/TM Mail Rept Dt. #70 upon FORM PTO-1618A [expires 6/3099].
    • The SECURITY AGREEMENT references in Section 1.2 UCC DEFINITIONS.
    • The UCC DEFINITIONS referenced in the SECURITY AGREEMENT make note of uncapitalized terms.
    • The uncapitalized terms in the SECURITY AGREEMENT references “account”, “account debtor” “chattel paper”. “contract right”. “document”, “warehouse receipt”, “bill of lading” .”document of title”, “instrument”, “inventory”, “equipment”, “general intangible”, “money”, “proceeds” and “purchase money security interest”
    • The uncapitalized terms in the SECURITY AGREEMENT notes the use of these words in “quotations” as used in Section 1.1 or elsewhere in this Agreement have the meanings of such terms as defined in the UCC.
    • The “Borrower” is implied as MERS by the use of quotations”
    • UCC laws require that text be “conspicuous.” section 2-316(2) states that a disclaimer of the implied warranty of merchantability must be conspicuous. section 1-201(10) specifies that
    • “language in the body of a form is ‘conspicuous’ if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color
    • The UNIFORM DEED OF TRUST instrument donates “Borrower” as the all caps _______
    • It would appear that according to the rules of Grammar and the UCC definitions the only “Person” for which a “Bank” can lend credit is to an organization.
    • The use of the words “Trustee” according to the UCC  § 3-110. ... (i) a trust, an estate, or a person described as trustee or representative of a trust or estate, the instrument ...
    • Contract Law is very specific, ALL CAPS generally means an ENTITY.
    • It has been established upon www.mers-servicerid.orgthat MIN stands for Member Identification Number.   The first seven digits identifies the alleged owner of the loan.   The second series of numbers identifies the loan associated with the DEED OF TRUST instrument.
    • The LOAN # disclosed upon the DEED OF TRUST instrument is _______.
    • The loan disclosed upon the DEED OF TRUST instrument is ______.
    • The owner of the loan is notated  by the first series of numbers is _______.
    • In accordance to the NATIONAL ARCHIVES FEDERAL REGISTER documents/2018/04/26/2018-08737pertaining to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce, OMB 0651-0027 citing §1057. Certificates of registration (a) upon the principal register shall be issued in the name of the United States of America.
    • Upon the DEED OF TRUST page 3, it notes BORROWER COVENANTS the Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and that the Property is unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record.
    • Seisin (or seizin) denotes the legal possession of a feudal fiefdom or fee. In feudalism, a fiefdom (also called a fief, feud, feoff, or fee) was a property or right that an overlord gave a vassal in exchange for military service.
    • "Of record" has a different meaning than "on record"
    • According to proper Grammar the word Property is an implied organization.
    • According to UCC General Definitions 1-201 (27) a "Person” is" an Estate”
    • According to the UCC , a BORROWER is an implied  PERSON.   A “Bank” can only lend credit to another “Bank”  or an “Organization”
    • According to the MERS Security Agreement the use of uncapitalized quotes implies the capitulation of the words underlaying meaning ie.  “Organization” is the same as ORGANIZATION.
    • According to proper Grammar “Lender” is an “Organization"
    • MERS loans are used in Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (herein REMIC)
    • REMIC’s are typically registered as"Société Anonyme” by the DEPOSITOR
    • A société anonyme is a type of business structure that establishes a company as a legal person that can own and transfer property, enter contracts, and be held liable for crimes.
    • socium (or soci)  in latin means Partner
    • Et Al in latin means and others
    • According to UCC General Definitions 1-201 (27) “Person” means “Partner”
    • 1099-A are for abandonment of “Partnership” Interests
    • It would be that these are abusive SOCI-ET-AL SUBJECT MATTERS of taxable partnership interests.
    • SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS OF CHARGES
    • FOR UCC clarity the DEED OF TRUST treated the individual as intellectual property Chattel under UCC §9-102(A)(41). For Clarity, under COLOR OF LAW there was the presumption of a PERSON as defined under UCC§1-201(4) under the presumption of a Consumer as defined under UCC§1-201(11). This is a breach of UCC§ 1-201(17) violating UCC§1-201(18) through a "banking organization" UCC§1-201(25) meaning a PERSON other than the individual who’s signature was used for usurpation. The MERS TRADEMARK by default became the UCC§ 1-201(35) "Security interest",
    • Application pursuant to section 305(b)(2) of the Trust Indenture Act for determining eligibility of a person designated as trustee for offerings on a delayed basis are genially missing.  It is clear in our conversation that councilor is aware these contracts lack FORM and FOUNDATION.
    • U.S. Code § 1338.Patents, plant variety protection, copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trademarks.
    • NO STATE COURT HELD THE JURISDICTION TO FORECLOSE
    • NO ATTORNEY COULD PRODUCE AN INJURED PARTY
    • NO ATTORNEY WOULD PRODUCE AN UNDERTAKING BOND
    • Count I
    • RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1962(C))
    • Count One alleges violations 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2) within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4).
    Predicate Acts
    Section 1961(1) of RICO also provides that “racketeering activity” includes any act indictable under 18 U.S.C. § 1832 (relating to theft of trade secrets) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 and/or 1512 (obstruction of justice). As set forth herein, in furtherance of the scheme to defraud the Plaintiff, the RICO Defendants engaged in numerous acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1832 and 18 U.S.C. § 1503 and/or 1512, including, without limitation, as set forth
    Each RICO Defendant "Acting" under COLOR OF OFFICE has conducted and participated in, directly or indirectly, the management, conduct and/or operation of the Enterprise and its affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity including acts indictable under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, and/or 1512 (obstruction of justice).
    This coordinated effort amounts to a set of related predicate acts with similar purposes, results, and methods, which included acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 and/or 1512 (obstruction of justice). These collaborations constituted a conspiracy to obstruct justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k).
    • WE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff has been injured in his business and property as a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c).
  • As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ actions, the Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, significant damages, including but not limited to, actual, compensatory, special, incidental, and consequential damages in addition to costs of defense and attorneys’ fees.
  • The RICO Defendants had a meeting of the minds, common intent, were aware of, special, incidental, and consequential damages in addition to costs of defense and attorneys’ fees. Among other things, the Plaintiff was forced to incur expenses in an amount to be determined at trial, in the form of defense costs, legal fees, and related expenses incurred in connection with his effort to defend against the Defendants’ actions
  • All of these injuries were sustained within, and were the result of conduct occurring within the United States.
  • The Plaintiff is entitled to recover, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code § 1964(c), treble damages in the amount to be determined by offer of proof at time of trial. The Plaintiff is also entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs of this litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or lost business opportunities attributable to the activities engaged in by defendants committed in furtherance of the Enterprise.
  • MASS RICO AT THIS SCALE IS IN FACT IN LAW CALLED TREASON
  • Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
  • These corporations, their franchises, successors, derivatives and assigns are hereby Nationalized under the Due Course of International Law and by Operation of Law that returns all Delegated Powers to the Delefators upon contractual Failure to Perform. This is the direct result of Gross Breach of Trust and violation of Commercial Service Contracts, fiscal incompetence and numerous act of crimes against the American People and States who are owned good faith and service from these organizations and the other Principals who are actually and contractually responsible for them.
  • This is also your International Notice that Federal Reserve Notes are an "Other Than Ordinary" domestic currency that has been misused and misrepresented as international currency under the TUMERS system. These Federal Reserve Notes have been funded via imposition of an undisclosed scheme to extract the value of labor from living people resulting in both enslavement and involuntary peonage. Therefor Federal Reserve Notes can no longer serve as legal tender as they are value-based upon criminal activities.